Discussion about this post

User's avatar
R. Toney Brooks, PhD's avatar

A very interesting piece! Thank you, Carolyn. Ontologically speaking -- and appealing to parsimony -- I lean more toward Faggin's Quantum Information Panpsychism (QIP), which regards consciousness as foundational, than Langan's CTMU model, which posits the co-emergence of consciousness and information. That said, the two models have a great deal of intriguing theoretical compatibility and opportunity for synthesis. May the One forgive us our syntheses.

Court Fisher's avatar

Carolyn, this is beautifully transmitted. Haven't had time to absorb Langan (or re-acquaint w/ John Wheeler), but your articulation re-points to an 'ancient' nondual wisdom. If/ when we directly experience and embody 'self,' 'other' and '(every)thing' as (S)ource, reality is no longer apart from me, us and the world; and every 'moment' then becomes meaningfully sacred. (Unfortunately, our culturally baggaged language still sets 'sacred' as some descriptor apart or separate from 'secular' and 'natural'). There's much more to be continually said, and we--including all cosmic kin--need return here. Thank you. 😉

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?